IEC Characterize Events Overview

image_1

Application note for the Dranetz automatic characterizer in HDPQ portable instruments.

Overview

The RMS variation characterizer analyzes cyclic records saved in the database and determines which of those records constitute an event based on a selected criterion. The result is a database record that contains the description of the event, detail of the event, and indices to the cyclic records in the database.

Characterizer Types

IEEE 1159 characterizer

RMS variations are characterized based on the IEEE 1159 Categories and Typical Characteristics of Power System Electromagnetic Phenomena. The table below summarizes the relationships between categories, duration, and magnitude:

Category Typical duration Typical Voltage Magnitude
Short Duration Variations
Instantaneous
Sag 0.5 – 30 cycles 0.1 – 0.9 pu
Swell 0.5 – 30 cycles 1.1 – 1.8 pu
Momentary
Interruption 0.5 cycles – 3 sec < 0.1 pu
Sag 30 cycles – 3 sec 0.1 – 0.9 pu
Swell 30 cycles – 3 sec 1.1 – 1.4 pu
Temporary
Interruption 3 sec – 1 min < 0.1 pu
Sag 3 sec – 1 min 0.1 – 0.9 pu
Swell 3 sec – 1 min 1.1 – 1.2 pu
Long Duration Variations
Interruption, Sustained > 1 minute 0.0 pu
Undervoltages > 1 minute 0.8 – 0.9 pu
Overvoltages > 1 minute 1.1 – 1.2 pu

IEC 61000-4-30 characterizer

RMS variations are characterized based on the IEC 61000-4-30 standard. Unlike the IEEE 1159 standard, the requirement does not consider the relationship between the magnitude and duration. The table below summarizes the requirement of the standard.

Category Typical duration Typical Voltage Magnitude
Interruption >=1 cycle 0.01 pu
Dip >=1 cycle 0.9 pu
Swell >=1 cycle 1.1 pu

Generic characterizer

Contiguous cycles recorded in the database are grouped together and called a data aggregate. Min and max values are calculated through the group and saved with the record. This mode is used when the selected preset is inrush or fault recorder.

Characterizer Engine

The RMS variation characterizer goes through the database periodically to analyze newly acquired data for events. It runs in the background routine where the other housekeeping routines are located. Whenever the instrument is idle, the 5-second ISR sets a flag to signal the characterizer to run. Once the flag is set, the characterizer will start from the last database index from the previous run up to the last index in the database.

Aggregated Events

The characterizer was intuitively designed to allow data characterization in groups. Aggregating channels in an event illustrates a fault as a system instead of independently treating each phase in a multi-phase system as a separate entity.

Channels are grouped according to the selected circuit type. In a three-phase circuit for instance, channels Va, Vb, and Vc are grouped together. A fault on more than one phase will result an aggregate event. For example, a sag occurred on phases A and B. The sag on phase A lasted for 30 cycles, 50 cycles for phase B. The result will be an aggregated event that has a total duration of 50 cycles.

An event starts when any channels in the group is out of limit and ends until all channels in the group are in limit. The group mask simply indicates which phases are grouped together. Split phase for example has two groups. Volts A and B (0x0003), and Amps A and B (0x0030).

When an event is in progress, the state of any channels in the group might change that will alter the category where the event should fall in. A sag for example might become an interruption. When this occurs, the characterizer will save the sag event, reset the start indices and counters, and wait for the interruption to come back in limit.

There are priorities when determining the state of an aggregated event based on severity. The highest is interruption, next is sag, then swell. Take for example an event on three-phase system that has a swell on derived channels A and B, and a sag on channel C. The aggregator will characterize the event as sag because of its priority, and the phenomena that the sag caused an unbalance to the system pulling the neutral that caused a swell on the other phases. Another example is an interruption on one phase and sag on the other phases. The characterizer will characterize the aggregated event as interruption because of priority through severity.

After finding an event, the characterizer will pass the search result to the categorizer. From the raw result, the categorizer will populate the necessary details of the event.

The IEEE and IEC characterizer use the same categorizer. Parameters that are not required by the IEC standard are still populated. The display screen decides whether the extra information is displayed based on the selected characterizer mode.

Brief Overview of the transient characterizer

Type – type of transient. Can be one of the following:

  • Unipolar Transient – One impulse in any direction.
  • Bipolar Transient – Two impulses in opposite directions.
  • Oscillatory Transient – at least three cycles of “visual” oscillation.
  • Arcing – Like oscillatory, but random. It follows a general envelope of the sine wave, that is, the values do not go to zero.
  • Multiple Zero Crossing – Impulse goes through the zero crossing.
  • Notching – Impulses are negative and regularly spaced.
  • Dropout – Starts with a sharp edge but goes to zero.
  • Switch On – Start at zero and then has a sharp edge.
  • Switch off – Starts at normal, has a sharp edge and goes to zero.
  • Phase shift – Change in phase of fundamental frequency.
  • DC – If DC (unipolar) is present for more than one full cycle.
  • Cap Switch – A special case of oscillation with initial negative direction followed by positive impulse reaching from 1.2 to 1.8 times the normal peak. Oscillation frequency is 400 to 2kHz.
  • Flat top – Flattened Top.
  • Peak Limit – Set if peak exceeds the user threshold.
  • Amplitude Change – Smooth changes in amplitude.
  • Miscellaneous – Set if any of the transient does not fall to any of the above categories.

Duration – In case of multiple hits, the width of the disturbance is measured from the start of the first to the end of the last. The reported notch width is the worst case. Duration can be any of the following:

  • Impulse
  • Notch
  • Multiple notch
  • Eight cycle
  • Multiple eight cycle
  • Quarter cycle
  • Multiple quarter cycle
  • Half cycle (+/- 10%)
  • Full cycle (+/- 10%)

Severity – Describes the severity of the transient based on the amplitude of the peak. Severity can be mild, moderate or severe.

Input – The input where the transient was detected.

Summary DB Record – Points to the related summary record in the database.

First Impulse Direction – Describes the direction of the transient, either positive or negative. Positive direction adds energy to the wave, that is, it heads away from the zero crossing. Negative on the other hand, subtracts energy from the wave. It heads towards the zero crossing.

Start Offset – Offset to be added to the timestamp for location of the start of the transient.

Point on Wave in Degrees – Phase degrees that corresponds to the main timestamp – the start of the wave sample set.

Microseconds per degree – Period in microseconds per degree in the waveform.

Width – Width of the entire transient in microseconds.

Offset to 50% – Offset to start of impulse at 50% width.

Width at 50% – Width of impulse at 50% width.

Amplitude at 50% – Actual signed amplitude at 50% width.

Offset to 10% – Offset to start of impulse where it exceeds 10%.

Rise time from 10% to 90% – Rise time in microseconds.

Amplitude at 10% – Actual signed amplitude at 10%.

Amplitude at 90% – Actual signed amplitude at 90%.

Offset to max peak – offset in microseconds.

Peak Value – Signed peak value in the whole run.

Peak Value Adjacent – uses adjacent peaks.

Worst peak-to-peak Value – worst peak-to-peak deviation in the whole run.

Zero Crossing Oscillating frequency – measured oscillating frequency in hertz.

Peak Oscillating Frequency – highest measured oscillating frequency in hertz.

The transient characterizer produces a record that contains the above information. High frequency and low frequency transients use the same database record. Some parameters are not populated for the low frequency, depending on the classification of the event.

Contact: info@powerquality.co.th

The Challenges of Harmonic Measurements to Identify the Source of Harmonic Distortion in a Network

Published by Terry Chandler, A Power Quality Practitioner ™ for 30 years, Director of Engineering Power Quality Thailand LTD/Power Quality Inc. USA,Consultant for Dranetz Corporation USA (Asia business unit General manager)


image_1

Harmonics defined by multiple standards around the world.

  • IEC 61000-4-7 Class I defines harmonics and how to measure them.
  • IEEE 519-2014 defines harmonic limits.
  • This paper is focused on the measurement technique, the accuracy of the measurement and identifying the source of the harmonics in a repeatable, industry recognized method.

Why do we need to measure harmonics?

  • Some local regulations require documented harmonic levels and maximum allowable harmonics
    • Many countries/states/city/electric utilities have these regulations
  • Electrical system issues related to harmonics:
    • Overheating transformers
    • Overheating neutrals
    • Power Factor Capacitor failures
    • Notching in the sinewave causes high frequency interference
    • Mystery breaker tripping
    • Transformer or panel audible noise
    • Unexplained electrical system interference and operations.
    • Low Power Factor

Measurement techniques are documented in detail by IEC 61000-4-30 class A Edition 3

  • IEC 61000-4-7 Class I standard (harmonics standard referenced)
  • All modern PQ meters that are rated Class A measure harmonics to this standard.
  • The instruments digitize the waveform and execute a FFT to calculate the harmonic values of THD and individual harmonics values The Harmonics FFT algorithm is specified exactly in the standard
  • Harmonics are calculated on 10/12 cycle samples and must be GAPLESS. (Some instruments state 99.9% gapless??)

Harmonic Current Flow

harmonic current flow_figure1
Figure 1: Distorted – current induced voltage distortion.
harmonic current flow_figure2
Figure 2

Harmonic Load Current

thd_cal

Impedance:

The AC circuit equivalent of resistance in DC circuits. Impedance is the opposition to AC current flow made up of the available circuit elements of resistance, capacitive reactance, and inductive reactance. Each AC current frequency (harmonic) may be subject to a different impedance in the circuit. – Mike Lowenstein is president of Harmonics Ltd., Monroe, Conn. 

harmonic load current
Figure 3

Voltage Distortion (result of current)

voltage distortion
Figure 4

Note : the distorted current is constant the voltage distortion changes based on the Measurement point.

Harmonic Flow on Feeders
Normal path:

harmonic flow on feeders

Figure 5: Harmonic currents tend to flow from the harmonic source (nonlinear load) into the utility source because it is the lowest impedance.

Flow Path Altered by Capacitor – II

  • Adding a capacitor causes current to flow in abnormal paths
harmonic flow on feeders2
Figure 6

Monitoring for Harmonic Studies

  • How long to monitor
  • What to monitor “voltage, current and power harmonics”
  • Where to monitor
  • Monitoring during a test

Monitoring Duration

  • The only constant in harmonics is the varying rate of change
    • Monthly
    • Weekly
    • Daily
    • Hourly
    • By the minute
    • By the second
    • By the cycle
  • Data is needed for the amount of time it takes to clearly define the harmonic situation under ALL conditions.

How many simultaneous monitoring points? It depends on the situation and loads.

monitoring points
Figure 7

 

Is voltage distortion from the voltage or the current?

data with weak correlation
Figure 8: Harmonic voltage and current trend – data with weak correlation

data with strong correlation
Figure 9: Harmonic and current trend – data with strong correlation.

The variations are useful time is in seconds!!

Harmonic Power Flow

  • Which direction is the harmonic power flowing? from the source to the load, or, from the load to the source?
  • A controversial topic, the most commonly accepted practice is to measure the harmonic watts. The phase angle, or the relationship between the voltage and current for a particular harmonic. (note: NOT THD!)
  • The same rules that would be applied to a pure sine wave of voltage and current (which has only a fundamental frequency component) would be applied here.

Harmonic current flow?

  • Why is harmonic current flow is always indicated as from the non-linear load/s end  towards the source end (“backwards” from normal load current flow) ?
  • Jbartos (Electrical) 20 Apr 01
    The nonlinear load is a source of harmonics. If electrical equivalent circuits are drawn, one for each harmonic frequency, the different frequency sources (harmonic frequency sources) will be located at the nonlinear load location and the harmonic currents will be flowing from it.
    • This assumes a perfect source with no harmonic distortion!! In the real world of electrical networks, the source is not perfect. – Terry C.

Measuring Harmonic Power Flow Low Voltage (Direct Connection)

PQ meter capabilities (measure the phase angle of harmonic voltage and current?)
  • Sampling frequency
  • (# of samples per cycle divided 2)
  • Voltage resolution (What is the minimum voltage a meter can make with defined accuracy?)
  • For example, if the 9th harmonic voltage is .1% of the 230v fundamental then actual voltage will be 0.23 Vrms. Most PQ meters minimum accuracy specification is 1vrms or 10 Vrms or a % of full scale at low levels.
  • Current resolution of the meter. Specification is typically +/- 0.1% reading +/- 0.05% of full scale. So, with a full scale of 100.00 amps of 50 Hz current and a 9th harmonic of .1 %, the current value of the 9th harmonic would be 0.1 amp. But the measurement accuracy would be +/- (.05X10=.5amps!!)
  •  Low voltage 10 amp

    – Frequency response
    – Low current accuracy (typical 10% to 90% rated)

CT’s – TR2510A

tr2510a
tr2510a table

 


Measuring Harmonic Power Flow (in a transmission or distribution system)

  • PQ meter capabilities (can it determine the phase angle of harmonic voltage and current?)
    • Sample frequency, Voltage resolution, Current resolution
  • PT
    • Frequency response
    • Voltage output resolution relative to instrument
  • HV/Medium CT
    • Frequency response
    • Output current magnitude
  • Low voltage CT
    • Frequency response
    • Output current magnitude

Typical PQ meter Voltage Accuracy

  • Permanently installed (D-BMI 61K)
  • 0 – 600V, 1000Vpk, AC/DC coupled
    • RMS: 512 Samples/cycle, +/- 0.1% Reading, +/-0.05%FS, over 7KHz bandwidth
    • IEC61000-4-30 Class A compliant
    • Harmonics: IEC61000-4-7
    • Flicker: IEC61000-4-15
    • PQ: IEEE1159, IEEE519

PQ meter Current Accuracy (voltage input without I to V transducer)

  • Range: 0 – 1.5V, DC coupled (AC/DC)
    • RMS:  512 Samples/Cycle, +/- 0.1% Reading, +/-0.05%FS, 3KHz bandwidth
    • IEC61000-4-30 Class A compliant
    • Harmonics: IEC61000-4-7
    • Flicker: IEC61000-4-15
    • PQ: IEEE1159, IEEE519

Medium Voltage or HV Voltage and Current Transducers

  • Voltage transducers
    • PT Potential Transformers (inductive)
    • CVT Capacitive voltage transducer
    • Resistive divider
  • Current transducers
    • Inductive
    • Fiber optic

Voltage Transducers (PT or VT)

  • Required to reduce the voltage level to safe to connect meter.
  • CVT (Capacitive coupled)
  • Inductive Transformer
  • Resistor divider

Frequency Response Transformer Type PT (Typical?)

frequency reponse tx type pt
Figure 10

Transducer Output Value at Harmonic Frequencies

Example:

  • VTHD Voltage Distortion of 2% at 110kV

Assume 50% of the THD is the 5th harmonic (1% 5th harmonic) 1 % of 110kV = 1.1kV of the 5th harmonic (250 hertz) / PT ratio 110kV to 100V divide by 1000.

Actual 5th harmonic voltage presented to instrument is 1.1 volt.

If 7th Voltage harmonic is 0.1% then 110/1000 = 0.1VAC is presented to voltage channel.

If 9th voltage harmonic is 0.01% .010 VAC is presented to the voltage channel.

Voltage channels are typically specified from 1 or 10vrms to 600v or 1000vrms.

VT Errors at Range of Frequencies

vt errors at range of freq
Figure 11: Transmission errors with various different inductive instrument transformer types.

Errors in Inductive Voltage Transformers PTs

errors in inductive voltage tx pt
Figure 12: Amplitude and phase errors of an inductive voltage transformer at various different frequencies.

HV/MV Inductive Current Transducers

  • Accuracy and frequency response
hv_mv inductive current transducers
Figure 13: Amplitude errors in an inductive current transformer at various different frequencies.

Secondary Current Transducer

  • Accuracy varies with frequency.
  • Frequency response is not linear.
  • Precision measurement of very low levels of harmonic power is limited by phase angle error of CT.
  • Example, if primary current is 50% of full load. CT secondary current would be 50% of 1 or 5 amps. (0.5 or 2.5 amps). If 5th harmonic current is 1%, = 0.005 amps or 0.025 amps. Clamp on CT minimum rated current is 0.1 amp.

Is it possible to identify the harmonic source on distribution substation buss? YES! But it’s not easy and it is expensive.

  • What is needed:
    • PQ instruments on the buss CT and PT that can record the V harmonics, I harmonics with phase angles and periodically record the 10 cycle sample waveforms of at least 128 samples per cycle.
    • PQ instruments on each feeder that is a significant load. (IE greater than 5%)
    • Software that can post process the data to align the time stamps, calculate all harmonic parameters including power from the waveform samples.
    • PQ engineering training to analyze the data.
    • Patience!

Conclusions

  • Monitoring and evaluating harmonics in electrical system is a complex task due to complexity of the measurements and interaction of the various loads.
  • Determining the source of the harmonics on the transmission or medium voltage grid has additional complexity of the voltage and current transducers.
  • With detailed simultaneous measurements of all feeders, PQ engineering and software it is possible to deduce the source of harmonics on a substation bus bar.
  • The only constant in harmonics is the varying rate of change!

Contact the author TerryC@powerquality.co.th

If you can’t explain it to a 6th grader, you don’t understand it yourself ~ Albert Einstein

Energy Usage Report for A Small Office Facility

Published by Thaweesak Aranchot, Electrical Engineer, Power Quality (Thailand) Co., Ltd.

Plan

  • Measure actual usage of each load for recording a consumption. Then determine a way to reduce the usage without impacting a business efficiency
  • Investigate the actual data comparing with Electricity bill

Introduction

  • The energy consumption at PQT was studied to determine\how much energy was used, where it is being used, and how much it costs.
  • Dranetz HDPQ Xplorer was setup for monitoring the usage at the main board of small office facility. EP1 was setup for determining an individual load.
  • Then investigate an energy usage and compare with a MEA electricity bill to determine the exact energy usage and cost.

Loads of the Building

Figure 1:

  • A main of air Conditioner is set as 25 degree.
  • Operate continuously 9 hours.
  • The usage is 18.8 kWh on working day

figure1Figure 1

Figure 2:

A trend plot is showing a usage of two 36-watt fluorescent lamps in an hour.

18W x 12 – Consumed à 2.94 kWh/Day

36W x 4 – Consumed à 3.83 kWh/Day

Total = 6.77 kWh/Day

figure2

figure2-2

Figure 2

Figure 3:

  • A full day used 1.29 kWh without opening a door.
  • The usage will be 1.77 kWh per day if disturbs refrigerator operating.

figure3Figure 3

Figure 4:

  • Water pump usage is operated for part time.
  • Trend plot displays an hour usage of a water pump.

figure4Figure 4

Blue area is operating area

Green area is non-operating area

Figure 5:

  • Office equipment: computer, router, printer, and CCTV.
  • Illustration is a consumption of Printer
  • Consumption is 2.35 kWh per Day

figure5

Figure 5

Blue area is operating area

Green area is non-operating area

A Consumption for Working Day

Load consumption of a working day in Percentage.

Average consumption is 30 kWh per day.

pie_chart

Figure 6:

  • Trend plot is displaying a business day usage for all loads in the office.
  • A business day usage is 31.3 kWh for per day

figure6Figure 6

Figure 7:  Working day usage between middle of December to middle of January.

figure7

Figure 7 – Working day consumption

A Consumption for Non-Working day

Display a single day usage for Non- Working day (Figure 8)

  • A day off usage is about 8 kWh
  • There are kinds of load that always run all times such as CCTV, security lights, router, refrigerator.

 

figure8

Figure 8

Figure 9: Non-working day usage between December 2018 to January 2019

figure9Figure 9

Total Consumption (Figure 10)

  • Electricity bill displays monthly usage during December 14, 2018 and January 14, 2019.
  • Total cost is 3,323.54 THB including vat, service charge and FT factor.

 

figure10

Figure 10

Solutions: How can we save cost of electricity?

Saving cost, we could reduce electricity of the main load for example:

  • Air conditioner: Typically, higher temperature can be able to reduce energy usage by decreasing 10% of usage. (Table below)

table

  • Clean an air filter regularly for saving 10% of the air conditioner consumption.
  • Reduce an operation time of air conditioner for an hour that can be able to reduce 10 % of Air conditioner usage. (Credit: Analysist energy management book for small and medium business, December 2012, Ministry of Energy, Thailand.)
  • Install an insulation on wall or ceiling to reduce temperature inside that allow the air conditioner work less than high temperature. (Credit: Department of Energy, United State of America.)

We could reduce electricity of load for example, Lighting:

  • Fluorescent lamp can be replaced with LED lamp to reduce energy usage.
  • A LED lamp costs 400 THB and owner will get back in 12.7 month.

Electric Vehicle Charger

Published by Terry Chandler, Director of Engineer, Power Quality Inc.

Power Quality study for EV charger post
• Manufacturer of EV has experienced several internal battery charger failures in new EV’s
• 2 sites, 1 in Arizona USA, 1 in Seoul, Korea.

ev_post car

The plan for USA site and Korea site
• Monitor the voltage quality supplying the charger post.
• Monitor the Voltage quality and current load of the EV internal battery charger
• Record all voltage quality parameters
• Record all load factors including
• Switching
• Harmonics
• Peak currents

Charging post details
FAST CHARGING – 7.7kW of power to charge your vehicle quickly
• QUALITY – Technology that works for the life of your current plug-in vehicle and then some
• CONVENIENT – 25 feet of charging cable for installation and operation flexibility
• DURABLE – Rugged, fully sealed NEMA 4 enclosure for installation anywhere

power charger

Electrical specifications of charging post
• Service – 208V to 240V – 40A, dedicated circuit
• Charge current output power – 208V to 240V – 32A max
• Service ground monitor – Constantly checks for presence of proper safety ground
• Automatic circuit recloser after minor power faults
• Charge Circuit Interruption Device – Ground fault protection with fully automated self-test, eliminates manual user testing

Charging post normal operation
Normally, the vehicle will immediately request a charge using a special communication line in the cable. Within a few seconds the green “Charging” light on the face of the HCS will turn on and the charging cycle will begin.
After an average driving day the vehicle battery pack will require several hours to recharge completely. Charging overnight is the most convenient way to maintain healthy batteries and ensure the vehicle’s full range will be available for the next day.

The front panel on the HCS has four indicators:

  • Power (yellow) indicates that power is available to the HCS.
  • Charging (green) indicates that the vehicle is requesting a charge and AC power is currently applied to the vehicle.
  • Power Fault (red) indicates that the HCS is not wired correctly. The problem can be due to improper grounding or a missing Earth Ground. The wiring should be examined by a qualified electrician.
  • Charging Fault (red) indicates that the HCS is unable to communicate with the vehicle correctly, or a safety fault condition has been detected by the unit. 

figure1 fron panel

Figure 1

Installation at the USA Test Setup
• Weather conditions, 105 to 120 degrees F.
• HCS Maximum Operating Temperature: -30°C to +50°C (-22°F to +122°F)
• Two cars were used for testing
• Dranetz HDPQ Explorer with 3 range Flexi CTs for recording voltage and current
• Channel A was connected to the 208V input to NCS-40 charger control panel.
• Channel C was connected to a test cable from the charger to the car.
• Installed 1 each Dranetz PowerVisa PQ monitor at Charging post B.

dranetz monitor

dranetz monitor2

Dranetz HDPQ monitor connected to incoming voltage of charger post.

connection from charger

Connection from Charger pedestal to EV.

Tests and monitoring included
• Input and output voltage and current of NCS not attached to car.
• Input and output voltage and current of NCS when attached to car and while charging
• Input and output voltage and current when connecting and disconnecting from car.
• Input and output voltage and current when connecting a second charger to a second car.
• Several repeats of these items

io voltage

Figure 2: Input and output voltage of NCS when attached to car and while charging.

Test results 
Input/output with an EV car not connected.
208-volt source voltage waveform from facility source was stable and within normal tolerance of +/-5%; frequency 60.0 hertz
No current and no 208-volt output. Small square wave output for signaling to EV car

Input/output with car connected.
• Output voltage delayed until car charger signal
• Output current delayed and slowly ramps up. More details needed. But apparent “soft start”
• Amazingly fast voltage transient recorded during connection time
• Voltage dropped when charging started.

Input/output during charging switching off
•When charger shuts off, voltage transient.

peak of rms voltage

rms voltage and peak

Harmonic voltage and current with charger on and off

harmonics

harmonics2

Input/output during connection of second car
• Voltage dropped further when second car connected.
• No noticeable transient when second car connected.
• Harmonic voltage distortion increase…..

Change instrument setup to provide better details for inrush current.
• During connection to car and intermittent connection was observed. This may be a contributing factor. Further investigation required

Monitoring Vrms during charger testing long term graph show voltage surge during the charger connection test. No voltage sags occurred. (Figure 3)

monitoring vrms

Figure 3

Voltage rise during test not due to testing of charger post or charger (Figure 4).

voltage enabled by evs

Figure 4

Source voltage variations with charger off (Figure 5).

connect to evs not charging

Figure 5

Source voltage transient to charger post (Figure 6).

voltage graph rms soure

Figure 6

RMS Voltage variations due to charger operation (Figure 7).

rms voltage variations

Figure 7

Harmonics charger on (Figure 8).

harmonics charger on

Figure 8

Harmonics charger off (Figure 9).

harmonics charger off

Figure 9

Summary
• Source voltage is fed direct to EV charger without filtering, regulation or surge protection.
• Harmonics increase when EV charger comes on is dependent on the source impedance and will vary site to site.
• The EV chargers are at risk to damage due to source voltage PQ events.
• Not all source voltage PQ issues are from the utility
• Some charger sites have transient voltage surge suppression.
• The EV charger loads will vary by EV manufacturer. Tested units showed charger current and supply voltage from the charger post are controlled by the EV charger.
 

PQSynergy™ Papers 2019

PQSynergy™ is an international forum to share experiences, requirements, questions, information, customer requirements, problems and solutions in the fast growth area of quality of supply requirements of sensitive loads, energy conservation and management and power quality monitoring and solutions. 

For more information, you can visit the website: www.pqsynergy.com

View and download papers:

PQSynergy™ PapersPublishers
A Case Study for Energy Usage ReportThaweesak Aranchot, Electrical Engineer
Power Quality (Thailand) Company., Ltd.
Challenge in Solar Rooftop PVMayura Srion, Chief of Power Quality Analysis Section, Customer Service Division
PEA Udon Thani 1, Thailand
Challenges with integrating PV into MV gridThomas Pua, Senior Product Development Engineer, Power Standards Lab, USA
Distributed Energy Storage System (ESS) and the GridKerk See Gim, Senior Manager, Power Automation, Singapore
Power Generation and Air PollutionJay Babin, Managing Director, E-Flow (Thailand) Company, Ltd.
Power Quality Causes and Effects with Biomass Power PlantDanaisak Tangsakha, Chief of PQ Analysis, Customer Service Division,Engineering & Service Department, PEA Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
Power Quality Practitioner™ WorkshopsTerence Chandler, Director of Engineering, Power Quality Inc., USA
PQSim200Robert James Stewart, Electrical Engineer, Power Quality (Thailand) Company., Ltd.
How can Blockchain Technology be used for Electrical Utilities in the futureRobert James Stewart, Electrical Engineer, Power Quality (Thailand) Company., Ltd.
Implementation of Four Lenses of InnovationKittipon Daychosawang, Engineer, Department of Customer Service, PEA Chiang Mai 2, Thailand
Intro to PQDIF and its ApplicationsThomas Szollossy, Senior Technical Support Engineer, Power Quality (Thailand) Company, Ltd.
Introduction to IEC 61850James Mater, General Manager, Smart Grid, Quality Logic Inc., USA
Leadership is . . . Probably Not What You Think It IsEric Stojkovich, President, ESC Pacific Inc., USA
Power Quality Techniques for Crushing Plant SolutionsSuwipha Kittitanapisarn, Chief of Power Quality Analysis Section, PEA Chiang Mai, Thailand
PQMS at Con EdisonTerence Chandler, General Manager, Dranetz Asia, Dranetz Corporation
PQSynergy™ Papers 2019

PQSynergy™ Papers 2018

PQSynergy™ is an international forum to share experiences, requirements, questions, information, customer requirements, problems and solutions in the fast growth area of quality of supply requirements of sensitive loads, energy conservation and management and power quality monitoring and solutions. 

For more information, you can visit the website: www.pqsynergy.com

View and download papers:

PQSynergy™ PapersPublishers
30 Years of History of PQ in Asia (And the World)Terry Chandler, A Power Quality PractitionerTM , Director of Engineering, Power Quality Thailand LTD/Power Quality Inc. USA
Active Harmonic Mitigation-What the Manufacturers Don’t Tell You!Tony Hoevenaars, PEng., MIRUS International Inc.
Generating Electricity Through Incineration, Opportunity or Threat for
Thailand
New Issues and Opportunities for Power QualityWilliam (Bill) Howe, Program Manager
Power Quality Research, EPRI
PQ Standards IEEE-519-2014 Applicable for Industrial + Commercial Supply SystemTushar Mogre, TASTM PowerTek
Strategies of Maintenance Management in CCPPPanida Boonyaritdachochai, Paveena Ketwong & Patcharachai Kaewwanna, B.Grimm
Technical Challenges of Remote Access to Instruments Over Mobile NetworkThomas Szollossy, B.Eng (EE), Senior Technical Support Engineer, Power Quality Thailand LTD
Unintended Consequences of DER Penetration in Distribution and MicrogridsStephane Do, Global Product Manager, Power Standards Lab (PSL)
A New Harmonics Option for PQSim200Thaweesak Aranchot, Power Quality (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Industrial Benchmarking of PQ and Various Methods and Merits Tushar Mogre, TASTM PowerTek
Introducing a PQ Simulator-PQSim200 Power Quality (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
The Opportunities for Battery Storage System in Demand SideJiravan MONGKOLTANATAS, Electrochemical Materials and System Lab (EMS), Materials for Energy Research Unit (MFERU), National Metal and Materials Technology Center (MTEC)
Power Quality in Singapore-The Past One DecadeEr. Muhammad Najmi Bin Bohari, Principal Consultant, Potentia Dynamics, MSc(Power Eng), B.Eng (EEE), P.Eng, ACPE, LEW, MIES, M-CIGRE
PSL Analyzer Products Power Standards Lab (PSL)
Singapore Energy Deregulation and Smart GridPower Automation
Advances in Software for Power Quality Monitoring SystemsBrian W Todd, Vice President, Dranetz Technology, General Manager, Electrotek Concepts
Embedded Systems-The Perfect Solution for Microgrid ControlKeith Houghton, Linklaser Limited
New development of EV and Chargers in ChinaQianlu Yan, Beijing Joint Harvest S&T Co., Ltd.
PEA Microgrid Design for Off-Grid IslandChakphed Madtharad, Ph.D., Smart Grid Planning Division, PEA
PQSynergy™ Papers 2018