Effect of Distribution Feeder Loading on Harmonic Resonance

Published by Electrotek Concepts, Inc., PQSoft Case Study: Effect of Distribution Feeder Loading on Harmonic Resonance, Document ID: PQS0703, Date: July 26, 2007.


Abstract: A utility operates 1200 kVAr and 600 kVAr capacitor banks on a 25.56kV distribution feeder. The utility uses frequency scan simulations to determine the effect of the capacitor banks and seasonal load levels on the impedance vs. frequency response characteristics for the feeder. It is assumed that the results will be more severe for the low load condition because there are lower levels of damping.

This case study evaluates the effect of seasonal load variation on the frequency response characteristic of a 25.56kV distribution feeder.

INTRODUCTION AND MODEL DEVELOPMENT

The effect of seasonal load variation on the frequency response characteristic of a 25.56kV distribution feeder was studied for the system shown in Figure 1. The accuracy of the system model was verified using three-phase and single-line-to-ground fault currents and other steady-state quantities, such as capacitor bank rated current and voltage rise. Frequency scan analysis was used to determine the impedance vs. frequency characteristic for the feeder for various operating conditions.

Figure 1 – Oneline Diagram for the Feeder Resonance Case Study
SIMULATION RESULTS

The following frequency scan cases were completed for the case study:

Case NumberScan LocationLoad ConditionCapacitor Bank Status
Case 1a1Full LoadAll Off
Case 1b1Full LoadAll On
Case 1c2Full LoadAll Off
Case 1d2Full LoadAll On
Case 1e3Full LoadAll Off
Case 1f3Full LoadAll On
Case 1g130% LoadAll Off
Case 1h130% LoadAll On
Case 1i230% LoadAll Off
Case 1j230% LoadAll On
Case 1k330% LoadAll Off
Case 1l330% LoadAll On
.

The frequency range for these cases was 60 Hz to 5,000 Hz (1 Hz increment). The load on the feeder for the “full load” condition was approximately 10.4 MVA at 98% power factor.

Figure 2 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 1 (600kVAr, full load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 2 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 1 with Full Load

Figure 3 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 2 (1,200kVAr, full load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 3 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 2 with Full Load

Figure 4 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 3 (substation bus, full load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 4 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 3 with Full Load

Figure 5 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 1 (600kVAr, 30% load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 5 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 1 with 30% Load

Figure 6 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 2 (1,200kVAr, 30% load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 6 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 2 with 30% Load

Figure 7 shows the impedance vs. frequency simulation results for scan location number 3 (substation bus, 30% load) without and with the feeder capacitor banks in service.

Figure 7 – Frequency Response at Scan Location Number 3 with 30% Load

Figure 8 shows the amplification factors for scan location number 1 (600kVAr) for the full load and 30% load conditions. Amplification factor is defined as the ratio of impedance with capacitor banks to the impedance without capacitor banks (e.g., Case 1b divided by Case 1a).

Figure 8 – Amplification Factors for Scan Location Number 1

Figure 9 shows the amplification factors for scan location number 2 (1,200kVAr).

Figure 9 – Amplification Factors for Scan Location Number 2

Figure 10 shows the amplification factors for scan location number 3 (substation bus).

Figure 10 – Amplification Factors for Scan Location Number 3
SUMMARY

The simulation results show that the impedance vs. frequency response characteristics for the feeder are more severe for the low load condition due to the fact that there are lower levels of damping (resistive elements).

Additional observations include:

1. For scan location number 1, the simulated parallel (high impedance) resonant frequencies were approximately 360 Hz, 700 Hz, and 1420 Hz. The series (lower impedance) resonant frequencies were approximately 540 Hz, and 1,200 Hz. The amplification factor range was between 0 and 3.4.

2. For scan location number 2, the parallel resonant frequencies were approximately 360 Hz and 700 Hz. The series resonant frequency was approximately 500 Hz. The amplification factor range was between 0 and 4.2.

3. For scan location number 3, the parallel resonant frequencies were approximately 360 Hz, 660 Hz, and 1380 Hz. The series resonant frequencies were approximately 460 Hz, 700 Hz, and 1440 Hz. The amplification factor range was between 0 and 1.83.

REFERENCES

Power System Harmonics, IEEE Tutorial Course, 84 EH0221-2-PWR, 1984.


RELATED STANDARDS
IEEE Std. 519-1992, IEEE Std. 1036-1992

GLOSSARY AND ACRONYMS
ASD: Adjustable-Speed Drive
CF: Crest Factor
DPF: Displacement Power Factor
PF: Power Factor
PWM: Pulse Width Modulation
THD: Total Harmonic Distortion
TPF: True Power Factor

Published by PQTBlog

Electrical Engineer

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s